Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Air Force paired 890 primary output with 57.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Anthony LaCoste College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Scrimmage yards
- 1,055
- Rushing yards
- 1,055
- Touchdowns
- 7
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Air Force | 1 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 51.7 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Air Force | 5 | 129 | 129 | 0 | 0 | 37.5 |
| 2012 Postseason | Air Force | 8 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Air Force | 8 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 11 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Air Force | 12 | 890 | 890 | 0 | 6 | 62 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 57.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Air Force
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
74.2
Efficiency
57.7
Usage
19.1
Consistency
35.5
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Colgate: 77. Utah State: 10. Boise State: 14. Wyoming: 27. Nevada: 9. Navy: 36. San Diego State: 109. Notre Dame: 59. Army: 263. New Mexico: 177. UNLV: 75. Colorado State: 34
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Colgate: 11 by 72.9. Utah State: 7 by 14.9. Boise State: 3 by 48.6. Wyoming: 9 by 31.3. Nevada: 2 by 46.9. Navy: 5 by 75. San Diego State: 22 by 51.6. Notre Dame: 8 by 76.8. Army: 23 by 97.6. New Mexico: 21 by 85.1. UNLV: 15 by 52.1. Colorado State: 9 by 39.4
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins170 · Games = 2 · +115 vs Losses
Losses55 · Games = 10 · -115 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Anthony LaCoste
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.