Usage Score
5.1
Player Dossier
2010-2012Tulane
Jamar Thomas
WR • 5'10" • Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jamar Thomas reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
96.7
Consistency
8.3
Season Value
42.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Tulane
101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jamar Thomas, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Tulane. Jamar Thomas reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Tulane paired 32 primary output with 96.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 96.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
4
Efficiency
96.7
Usage
5.1
Consistency
8.3
Best Game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Tulsa: 14. UAB: 0. UTEP: 18. SMU: 0. Houston: 0. Rice: 0. Hawai'i: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Losses5.3 · n=6
First Half8 · n=4 · +8 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · n=4 · -8 vs First Half
All Games4 · n=8
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTEP
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulane | 5 | 33.3 | 5.3 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulane | 32 | 96.7 | 5.1 | 27 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | — | — | -32 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18
Primary metric
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulsa
14
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
UCF
5
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#4
Marshall
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Tulane
32 primary output · 96.7 efficiency · 5.1 usage
42.6
#2
2010 Regular Season · Tulane
13.7
5 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 5.3 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Tulane
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8111
Southern Lab · Baton Rouge, LA
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
37
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.