Usage / Role
16%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2010-2014Stanford
RB • 5'9" • Escondido, CA, USA
Ricky Seale leans balanced backfield option traits and 27.3 efficiency.
Usage / Role
16%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
39
Developing production for a back
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
37
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Stanford
Snapshot
Ricky Seale, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Stanford. Ricky Seale leans balanced backfield option traits and 27.3 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Regular Season | Stanford | 4 | 26 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 32.6 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Stanford | 6 | 57 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 53.1 |
| 2013 Postseason | Stanford | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 34.4 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Stanford | 7 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 34.4 |
| 2014 Postseason | Stanford | 10 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 50.6 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 10 | 56 | 46 | 10 | 0 | 50.6 |
Related Context
Ricky Seale played RB for Stanford. Across 5 tracked seasons, Ricky Seale recorded 171 rushing yards, 13 receiving yards, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Stanford.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Stanford paired 57 primary output with 45.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 27.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Win with 12 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
6.7
Efficiency
27.3
Usage
4.5
Consistency
62.3
Best Game by takeover score
UCLA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Maryland: 11. UC Davis: 9. USC: 3. Army: 10. Notre Dame: 1. Arizona State: 3. Oregon State: 3. Utah: 4. California: 11. UCLA: 12
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Maryland: 4 by 28.6. UC Davis: 4 by 13.5. USC: 1 by 31.3. Army: 3 by 35.8. Notre Dame: 1 by 10.4. Arizona State: 1 by 31.3. Oregon State: 2 by 15.6. Utah: 1 by 41.7. California: 5 by 22.9. UCLA: 3 by 41.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
41.7 vs UCLA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | vs Maryland | W 45-21 | 4 | 11 | 2.80 | 1 | — | — | 2.8 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ UCLA | W 31-10 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ California | W 38-17 | 5 | 11 | 2.20 | 0 | — | — | 2.2 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Utah | L 17-20 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Oregon State | W 38-14 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | — | — | 1.5 |
| Sun 10/19 | @ Arizona State | L 10-26 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Notre Dame | L 14-17 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Army | W 35-0 | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3.3 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs USC | L 10-13 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UC Davis | W 45-0 | 3 | 2 | 0.70 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2.3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Stanford | 26 | 36.2 | 3 | 26 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Stanford | 57 | 45.2 | 3.9 | 31 |
| 2013 Postseason | Stanford | 34 | 32.2 | 2.8 | -23 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Stanford | 34 | 32.2 | 2.8 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Stanford | 67 | 27.3 | 4.5 | 33 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 67 | 27.3 | 4.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Washington
Week 6 · W 31-28 · Conference game
Win with 17 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
17
Scrimmage Yards
68.6 takeover
17 scrimmage yards and 2 usage.
#2
@ Duke
Week 2 · W 44-14
15
Scrimmage Yards
63.2 takeover
Win with 15 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
15 scrimmage yards and 4 usage.
#3
@ Colorado
Week 10 · W 48-0 · Conference game
18
Scrimmage Yards
55.2 takeover
Win with 18 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
18 scrimmage yards and 6.5 usage.
#4
@ UCLA
Week 14 · W 31-10 · Conference game
12
Scrimmage Yards
52 takeover
Win with 12 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
12 scrimmage yards and 5 usage.
#5
vs Maryland
Week 1 · W 45-21 · Postseason
11
Scrimmage Yards
46.1 takeover
Win with 11 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
11 scrimmage yards and 6.3 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · Stanford
57 primary output · 45.2 efficiency · 3.9 usage
53.1
#2
2014 Postseason · Stanford
50.6
67 primary · 27.3 efficiency · 4.5 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Stanford
50.6
67 primary · 27.3 efficiency · 4.5 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.