Usage / Role
2%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2010-2012Troy
WR • 6'4" • Fort Lee, VA, USA
Sam Haskins reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
2%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
8
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
11
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
18
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Troy
Snapshot
Sam Haskins, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Troy. Sam Haskins reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Regular Season | Troy | 3 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 53.9 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
Related Context
Sam Haskins played WR for Troy. Across 3 tracked seasons, Sam Haskins recorded 24 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Troy.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Troy paired 24 primary output with 53.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 53.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
8
Efficiency
53.3
Usage
3.3
Consistency
51.4
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 14. UAB: 6. Navy: 4
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 1 by 93.3. UAB: 1 by 40. Navy: 1 by 26.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
93.3 vs Arkansas
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Troy
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Troy | 24 | 53.3 | 3.3 | 24 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | — | — | -24 |
#1 Featured game
@ Arkansas
Week 3 · L 28-38
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
14
Receiving Yards
67.5 takeover
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#2
vs UAB
Week 5 · W 24-23
6
Receiving Yards
31.3 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#3
@ Navy
Week 10 · L 14-42
4
Receiving Yards
22.5 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · Troy
24 primary output · 53.3 efficiency · 3.3 usage
53.9
#2
2010 Regular Season · Troy
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Troy
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.