Usage Score
21.1
Player Dossier
2010-2013North Texas
WR • 5'9" • Copperas Cove, TX, USA
Brelan Chancellor reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
21.1
Efficiency
80.1
Consistency
45.1
Season Value
61.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brelan Chancellor, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · North Texas. Brelan Chancellor reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
North Texas paired 792 primary output with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Idaho
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
60.9
Efficiency
80.1
Usage
21.1
Consistency
45.1
Best Game by takeover score
UNLV
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 74. Idaho: 135. Ohio: 33. Ball State: 88. Georgia: 12. Tulane: 103. Middle Tennessee: 26. Louisiana Tech: 95. Southern Miss: 127. Rice: 23. UTEP: 25. UTSA: 15. Tulsa: 36
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 6 by 82.2. Idaho: 6 by 100. Ohio: 1 by 100. Ball State: 9 by 65.2. Georgia: 1 by 80. Tulane: 7 by 98.1. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 57.8. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 100. Southern Miss: 4 by 100. Rice: 2 by 76.7. UTEP: 2 by 83.3. UTSA: 2 by 50. Tulsa: 5 by 48
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Idaho
Best efficiency game
100 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs UNLV | W 36-14 | — | 6 | 74 | 9.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Tulsa | W 42-10 | — | 5 | 36 | 9.5 | 7.20 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs UTSA | L 13-21 | — | 2 | 15 | 6 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs UTEP | W 41-7 | — | 2 | 25 | 15.3 | 12.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Thu 10/31 | vs Rice | W 28-16 | — | 2 | 23 | 9.7 | 11.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Southern Miss100 receiving yards | W 55-14 | — | 4 | 127 | 31.8 | 31.80 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 28-13 | — | 5 | 95 | 16.3 | 19 | 1 | 61 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 34-7 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Tulane100 receiving yards | L 21-24 | — | 7 | 103 | 13 | 14.70 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Georgia | L 21-45 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Ball StateHigh volume | W 34-27 | — | 9 | 88 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Ohio | L 21-27 | — | 1 | 33 | 17.5 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Idaho100 receiving yards | W 40-6 | — | 6 | 135 | 20.6 | 22.50 | 1 | 85 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | North Texas | 12 | 80 | 7.7 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | North Texas | 457 | 71.6 | 20.2 | 445 |
| 2012 Regular Season | North Texas | 450 | 75.8 | 24.1 | -7 |
| 2013 Postseason | North Texas | 792 | 80.1 | 21.1 | 342 |
| 2013 Regular Season | North Texas | 792 | 80.1 | 21.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
LSU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114
Primary metric
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida Atlantic
135
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Idaho
135
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
127
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · North Texas
792 primary output · 80.1 efficiency · 21.1 usage
61.3
#2
2013 Regular Season · North Texas
61.3
792 primary · 80.1 efficiency · 21.1 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · North Texas
50.6
457 primary · 71.6 efficiency · 20.2 usage
7
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.7333
Copperas Cove · Copperas Cove, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,711
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brelan Chancellor quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit