Usage Score
26.9
Player Dossier
2010-2013North Texas
RB • 5'10" • Copperas Cove, TX, USA
Brandin Byrd leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.7 efficiency.
Usage Score
26.9
Efficiency
48.7
Consistency
42.7
Season Value
54.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandin Byrd, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · North Texas. Brandin Byrd leans balanced backfield option traits and 48.7 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
North Texas paired 952 primary output with 42.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 48.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
86.2
Efficiency
48.7
Usage
26.9
Consistency
42.7
Best Game by takeover score
UNLV
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 52. Idaho: 57. Ohio: 30. Ball State: 90. Georgia: 29. Tulane: 10. Middle Tennessee: 139. Louisiana Tech: 77. Southern Miss: 61. Rice: 61. UTEP: 202. UTSA: 52. Tulsa: 261
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 20 by 27.1. Idaho: 7 by 83.9. Ohio: 13 by 26.5. Ball State: 19 by 47.2. Georgia: 12 by 23.1. Tulane: 10 by 4.2. Middle Tennessee: 20 by 72.4. Louisiana Tech: 15 by 53.1. Southern Miss: 20 by 31.8. Rice: 20 by 31.8. UTEP: 18 by 96.8. UTSA: 12 by 45.1. Tulsa: 27 by 90.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
96.8 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs UNLV | W 36-14 | 20 | 52 | 2.60 | 0 | — | — | 2.6 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Tulsa100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 42-10 | 26 | 251 | 9.70 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 9.7 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs UTSA | L 13-21 | 12 | 52 | 4.30 | 0 | — | — | 4.3 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs UTEP100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 41-7 | 18 | 202 | 11.20 | 2 | — | — | 11.2 |
| Thu 10/31 | vs Rice | W 28-16 | 20 | 61 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3.0 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Southern Miss2+ TD | W 55-14 | 20 | 61 | 3 | 2 | — | — | 3.0 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 28-13 | 14 | 71 | 5.10 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Middle Tennessee100 rush yards | W 34-7 | 20 | 139 | 6.90 | 1 | — | — | 7.0 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Tulane | L 21-24 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 1 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Georgia | L 21-45 | 11 | 23 | 2.10 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2.4 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Ball State | W 34-27 | 18 | 79 | 4.40 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4.7 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Ohio | L 21-27 | 10 | 27 | 2.70 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2.3 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Idaho2+ TD | W 40-6 | 7 | 57 | 8.10 | 2 | — | — | 8.1 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | North Texas | 175 | 41.9 | 8.1 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | North Texas | 99 | 30.7 | 3.7 | -76 |
| 2012 Regular Season | North Texas | 952 | 42.6 | 32.4 | 853 |
| 2013 Postseason | North Texas | 1,121 | 48.7 | 26.9 | 169 |
| 2013 Regular Season | North Texas | 1,121 | 48.7 | 26.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
261
Primary metric
261 scrimmage yards and 40.3 usage.
#2
South Alabama
123
Primary metric
Win with 123 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
123 scrimmage yards and 39.5 usage.
#3
Western Kentucky
83
Primary metric
Win with 83 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
83 scrimmage yards and 9.6 usage.
#4
UTEP
202
Primary metric
Win with 202 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
202 scrimmage yards and 34.6 usage.
#5
Western Kentucky
116
Primary metric
Loss with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
116 scrimmage yards and 36.2 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · North Texas
952 primary output · 42.6 efficiency · 32.4 usage
59.6
#2
2013 Postseason · North Texas
54.6
1,121 primary · 48.7 efficiency · 26.9 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · North Texas
54.6
1,121 primary · 48.7 efficiency · 26.9 usage
7
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
5
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.7444
Copperas Cove · Copperas Cove, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,347
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brandin Byrd quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit