Usage Score
21.2
Player Dossier
2010-2013Fresno State
Isaiah Burse
WR • 6'0" • Modesto, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Isaiah Burse reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.8
Consistency
68.6
Season Value
63.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Fresno State
10101112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Fresno State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: San José State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Isaiah Burse, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Fresno State. Isaiah Burse reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Fresno State paired 1,026 primary output with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boise State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Fresno State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
78.9
Efficiency
69.8
Usage
21.2
Consistency
68.6
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 39. Rutgers: 118. Unknown: 43. Boise State: 148. Hawai'i: 9. Idaho: 68. UNLV: 73. San Diego State: 74. Nevada: 58. Wyoming: 61. New Mexico: 107. San José State: 96. Utah State: 132
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 5 by 52. Rutgers: 13 by 60.5. Unknown: 4 by 71.7. Boise State: 10 by 98.7. Hawai'i: 2 by 30. Idaho: 5 by 90.7. UNLV: 8 by 60.8. San Diego State: 10 by 49.3. Nevada: 4 by 96.7. Wyoming: 5 by 81.3. New Mexico: 6 by 100. San José State: 10 by 64. Utah State: 17 by 51.8
Split Comparison
Wins84.8 · n=10 · +17.3 vs Losses
Losses67.5 · n=2 · -17.3 vs Wins
First Half71.1 · n=7 · -16.9 vs Second Half
Second Half88 · n=6 · +16.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Boise State
Best efficiency game
100 vs New Mexico
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ USC | L 20-45 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 12/8 | vs Utah State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-17 | — | 17 | 132 | 7.6 | 7.80 | 1 | 20 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ San José StateHigh volume | L 52-62 | — | 10 | 96 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs New Mexico100 receiving yards | W 69-28 | — | 6 | 107 | 16.9 | 17.80 | 0 | 52 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ Wyoming | W 48-10 | — | 5 | 61 | 9.3 | 12.20 | 1 | 21 |
| Sun 11/3 | vs Nevada | W 41-23 | — | 4 | 58 | 12.6 | 14.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 10/27 | @ San Diego StateHigh volume | W 35-28 | — | 10 | 74 | 7.6 | 7.40 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 10/20 | vs UNLVHigh volume | W 38-14 | — | 8 | 73 | 9.2 | 9.10 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Idaho | W 61-14 | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 1 | 29 |
| Sun 9/29 | @ Hawai'i | W 42-37 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Boise State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-40 | — | 10 | 148 | 15.3 | 14.80 | 0 | 41 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 24 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Rutgers100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-51 | — | 13 | 118 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 0 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Fresno State
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201020112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Fresno State | 190 | 70.3 | 9.3 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Fresno State | 190 | 70.3 | 9.3 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Fresno State | 436 | 56.9 | 15.5 | 246 |
| 2012 Postseason | Fresno State | 851 | 79.4 | 17.3 | 415 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Fresno State | 851 | 79.4 | 17.3 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Fresno State | 1,026 | 69.8 | 21.2 | 175 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Fresno State | 1,026 | 69.8 | 21.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
San José State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
135
Primary metric
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Boise State
148
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
148 receiving yards with a 98.7 efficiency score.
#3
Air Force
158
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
63
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico
107
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Fresno State
1,026 primary output · 69.8 efficiency · 21.2 usage
63.7
#2
2013 Regular Season · Fresno State
63.7
1,026 primary · 69.8 efficiency · 21.2 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Fresno State
59.8
851 primary · 79.4 efficiency · 17.3 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8467
Modesto Christian · Modesto, CA
- Committed To
- Fresno State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,503
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.