Player Dossier

2010-2014

Western Kentucky

Joel German

WR • 6'0" • Fort Myers, FL, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Joel German reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

7.9

Efficiency

61.9

Consistency

52.3

Season Value

55.5

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Western Kentucky

101112131414

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
Western Kentucky
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Joel German, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Western Kentucky. Joel German reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Joel German played WR for Western Kentucky. Across 5 tracked seasons, Joel German recorded 784 receiving yards and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Western Kentucky.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

Western Kentucky paired 339 primary output with 84.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 61.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTEP

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · Western Kentucky

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

27.5

Efficiency

61.9

Usage

7.9

Consistency

52.3

Best Game by takeover score

Central Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 27. Bowling Green: 24. Illinois: 35. Middle Tennessee: 17. Navy: 10. UAB: 43. Florida Atlantic: 3. Old Dominion: 45. Louisiana Tech: 34. UTEP: 92. Army: 0. UTSA: 11. Marshall: 17

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 4 by 45. Bowling Green: 1 by 100. Illinois: 2 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 56.7. Navy: 2 by 33.3. UAB: 2 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 20. Old Dominion: 1 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 75.6. UTEP: 3 by 100. Army: 1 by 0. UTSA: 2 by 36.7. Marshall: 3 by 37.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins28.3 · Games = 8 · +1.9 vs Losses
Losses26.4 · Games = 5 · -1.9 vs Wins
First Half22.7 · Games = 7 · -10.5 vs Second Half
Second Half33.2 · Games = 6 · +10.5 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

UTEP

Best efficiency game

100 vs UTEP

Result
Wed 12/24vs Central MichiganW 49-484276.86.80112
Fri 11/28@ MarshallW 67-663175.75.7019
Sat 11/22vs UTSAW 45-72115.55.50010
Sat 11/15vs ArmyW 52-24100000
Sat 11/8vs UTEPW 35-2739230.730.70150
Sat 11/1@ Louisiana TechL 10-5933411.311.30023
Sat 10/25vs Old DominionW 66-511454545145
Sat 10/18@ Florida AtlanticL 38-45133303
Sat 10/4vs UABL 39-4224321.521.50039
Sat 9/27@ NavyW 36-272105508
Sat 9/13@ Middle TennesseeL 47-502178.58.5009
Sat 9/6@ IllinoisL 34-4223517.517.50021
Fri 8/29vs Bowling GreenW 59-311242424024

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Western Kentucky

    2010-2014

    Opening stop

Season Progression

201020112012201320142014
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2010 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky0
2011 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky8771.718.287
2012 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky0-87
2013 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky33984.914.2339
2014 PostseasonWestern Kentucky35861.97.919
2014 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky35861.97.90

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

UTEP

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

92

Primary metric

92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Navy

87

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

87 receiving yards with a 82.9 efficiency score.

#3

Navy

45

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

45 receiving yards with a 75 efficiency score.

#4

Louisiana

67

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Tennessee

46

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2013 Regular Season · Western Kentucky

339 primary output · 84.9 efficiency · 14.2 usage

65

#2

2014 Postseason · Western Kentucky

55.5

358 primary · 61.9 efficiency · 7.9 usage

#3

2014 Regular Season · Western Kentucky

55.5

358 primary · 61.9 efficiency · 7.9 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

2★

Class 2010 · Rating 0.7889

Dunbar · Fort Myers, FL

Committed To
Western Kentucky
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2010

Career Facts

1

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

784

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.