Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Washington State paired 4,420 primary output with 51.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Washington State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Regular Season | Washington State | 4 | 932 | 960 | -28 | 9 | 41 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Washington State | 9 | 1,722 | 1,878 | -156 | 15 | 46.2 |
| 2013 Postseason | Washington State | 13 | 361 | 410 | -49 | 6 | 69.5 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Washington State | 13 | 4,059 | 4,187 | -128 | 28 | 69.5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Washington State | 9 | 3,742 | 3,873 | -131 | 32 | 66.5 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Washington State paired 4,420 primary output with 51.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 56.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Loss with 516 yards of offense and 60.9 efficiency. It landed in the 77.8th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
415.8
Efficiency
56.7
Usage
21.2
Consistency
77.6
Best Game by takeover score
Rutgers
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rutgers: 516. Nevada: 367. Portland State: 532. Oregon: 430. Utah: 392. California: 751. Stanford: 236. Arizona: 478. USC: 40
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rutgers: 61 by 60.9. Nevada: 63 by 52.4. Portland State: 63 by 56.6. Oregon: 64 by 56.5. Utah: 65 by 51.9. California: 73 by 78.5. Stanford: 73 by 47.6. Arizona: 84 by 53.1. USC: 9 by 53.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.