Player Stats

David Fluellen College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,993
Rushing yards
3,331
Receiving yards
662
Touchdowns
30

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2010 PostseasonToledo956560034.3
2010 Regular SeasonToledo920716839134.3
2011 PostseasonToledo1228280047.2
2011 Regular SeasonToledo12615460155647.2
2012 PostseasonToledo1238380083.4
2012 Regular SeasonToledo121,7061,4602461383.4
2013 Regular SeasonToledo91,3431,1212221080.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Toledo paired 1,744 primary output with 58 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 70.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Regular Season · Toledo

Games

9

Scrimmage Yards / G

149.2

Efficiency

70.1

Usage

39.2

Consistency

74.9

Best Game by takeover score

Western Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida: 88. Missouri: 211. Eastern Washington: 147. Central Michigan: 204. Ball State: 144. Western Michigan: 234. Navy: 183. Bowling Green: 61. Northern Illinois: 71

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 12 by 62.5. Missouri: 27 by 73.4. Eastern Washington: 23 by 69.2. Central Michigan: 33 by 64.2. Ball State: 31 by 49.2. Western Michigan: 25 by 89. Navy: 23 by 83.2. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. Northern Illinois: 17 by 39.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins165.8 · Games = 5 · +37.3 vs Losses
Losses128.5 · Games = 4 · -37.3 vs Wins