Usage Score
11
Player Dossier
2010-2013Ohio
Troy Hill
TE • 6'5" • New Kensington, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Troy Hill reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77
Consistency
70.6
Season Value
64.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Ohio
101011121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Ohio
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Troy Hill, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Ohio. Troy Hill reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Ohio paired 257 primary output with 77 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Ohio
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
28.6
Efficiency
77
Usage
11
Consistency
70.6
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. East Carolina: 4. Marshall: 44. Central Michigan: 19. Eastern Michigan: 26. Miami (OH): 59. Buffalo: 30. Bowling Green: 28. Kent State: 32. Massachusetts: 15
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Carolina: 1 by 26.7. Marshall: 4 by 73.3. Central Michigan: 2 by 63.3. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 86.7. Miami (OH): 3 by 100. Buffalo: 2 by 100. Bowling Green: 2 by 93.3. Kent State: 2 by 100. Massachusetts: 2 by 50
Split Comparison
Wins36 · n=4 · +13.4 vs Losses
Losses22.6 · n=5 · -13.4 vs Wins
First Half30.4 · n=5 · +4.1 vs Second Half
Second Half26.3 · n=4 · -4.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/23 | @ East Carolina | L 20-37 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Massachusetts | W 51-23 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Wed 11/20 | vs Kent State | L 13-44 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 17 |
| Wed 11/13 | @ Bowling Green | L 0-49 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 16 |
| Wed 11/6 | @ Buffalo | L 3-30 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Miami (OH) | W 41-16 | — | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 56-28 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Central Michigan | L 23-26 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 9/15 | vs Marshall | W 34-31 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 32 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020102011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Ohio | 24 | 53.3 | 6.8 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 24 | 53.3 | 6.8 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | -24 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio | 169 | 62 | 12.6 | 169 |
| 2013 Postseason | Ohio | 257 | 77 | 11 | 88 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio | 257 | 77 | 11 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59
Primary metric
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Akron
52
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 69.3 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
14
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico State
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Buffalo
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Ohio
257 primary output · 77 efficiency · 11 usage
64.7
#2
2013 Regular Season · Ohio
64.7
257 primary · 77 efficiency · 11 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Ohio
48.9
169 primary · 62 efficiency · 12.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7
Valley · New Kensington, PA
- Committed To
- Ohio
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
450
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.