Usage Score
11.4
Player Dossier
2010-2014Ohio
WR • 6'2" • Lebanon, OH, USA
Chase Cochran reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11.4
Efficiency
73.8
Consistency
44.9
Season Value
49.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chase Cochran, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Ohio. Chase Cochran reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Ohio paired 689 primary output with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
36.9
Efficiency
73.8
Usage
11.4
Consistency
44.9
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 7. Kentucky: 7. Marshall: 53. Idaho: 79. Unknown: 6. Central Michigan: 59. Bowling Green: 31. Akron: 22. Western Michigan: 110. Buffalo: 47. Northern Illinois: 4. Miami (OH): 18
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 1 by 46.7. Kentucky: 1 by 46.7. Marshall: 1 by 100. Idaho: 2 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 40. Central Michigan: 2 by 100. Bowling Green: 4 by 51.7. Akron: 2 by 73.3. Western Michigan: 4 by 100. Buffalo: 1 by 100. Northern Illinois: 1 by 26.7. Miami (OH): 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/26 | @ Miami (OH) | W 24-21 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Wed 11/19 | vs Northern Illinois | L 14-21 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Thu 11/6 | vs Buffalo | W 37-14 | — | 1 | 47 | 47 | 47 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Western Michigan100 receiving yards | L 21-42 | — | 4 | 110 | 27.5 | 27.50 | 1 | 66 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Akron | W 23-20 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Bowling Green | L 13-31 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Central Michigan | L 10-28 | — | 2 | 59 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Idaho | W 36-24 | — | 2 | 79 | 39.5 | 39.50 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Marshall | L 14-44 | — | 1 | 53 | 53 | 53 | 0 | 53 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Kentucky | L 3-20 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Kent State | W 17-14 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Ohio | 377 | 60.9 | 9.5 | 377 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio | 377 | 60.9 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Ohio | 689 | 84.1 | 17.2 | 312 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio | 689 | 84.1 | 17.2 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio | 443 | 73.8 | 11.4 | -246 |
#1 Featured game
UL Monroe
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
162
Primary metric
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
110
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
138
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
North Texas
103
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
122
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Ohio
689 primary output · 84.1 efficiency · 17.2 usage
62.1
#2
2013 Regular Season · Ohio
62.1
689 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 17.2 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Ohio
49.2
443 primary · 73.8 efficiency · 11.4 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.7844
Lebanon · Lebanon, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,509
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Chase Cochran quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit