Usage Score
10.4
Player Dossier
2010-2014Louisville
WR • 6'5" • Mascoutah, IL, USA
Matt Milton reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.4
Efficiency
100
Consistency
93.3
Season Value
75.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Louisville
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Matt Milton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Louisville. Matt Milton reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Matt Milton played WR for Tennessee and Louisville. Across 5 tracked seasons, Matt Milton recorded 103 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Louisville.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Louisville paired 85 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tennessee, Louisville.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
42.5
Efficiency
100
Usage
10.4
Consistency
93.3
Best Game by takeover score
Syracuse
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 34. Syracuse: 51
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
100 vs Syracuse
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2010-2011
Opening stop
Louisville
2012-2014
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Tennessee | 12 | 80 | 3.8 | 12 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Louisville | 0 | — | — | -12 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Louisville | 6 | 40 | 4.5 | 6 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Louisville | 85 | 100 | 10.4 | 79 |
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51
Primary metric
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
34
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Florida International
6
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Louisville
85 primary output · 100 efficiency · 10.4 usage
75.6
#2
2011 Regular Season · Tennessee
49.4
12 primary · 80 efficiency · 3.8 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Louisville
37.9
6 primary · 40 efficiency · 4.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.9307
Mascoutah · Mascoutah, IL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
103
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.