Player Dossier

2010-2012

South Carolina

Ace Sanders

WR • 5'8" • Bradenton, FL, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Ace Sanders reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

20.9

Efficiency

72.2

Consistency

46.2

Season Value

59.8

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · South Carolina

101011111212

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
South Carolina
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Clemson

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Ace Sanders, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · South Carolina. Ace Sanders reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Ace Sanders played WR for South Carolina. Across 3 tracked seasons, Ace Sanders recorded 19 passing yards, 72 rushing yards, and 1,230 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with South Carolina.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

South Carolina paired 531 primary output with 72.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 72.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Clemson

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · South Carolina

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

40.8

Efficiency

72.2

Usage

20.9

Consistency

46.2

Best Game by takeover score

Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 92. Vanderbilt: 13. East Carolina: 4. UAB: 55. Missouri: 23. Kentucky: 15. Georgia: 0. LSU: 49. Florida: 32. Tennessee: 79. Arkansas: 15. Unknown: 35. Clemson: 119

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 9 by 68.1. Vanderbilt: 2 by 43.3. East Carolina: 1 by 26.7. UAB: 4 by 91.7. Missouri: 1 by 100. Kentucky: 4 by 25. LSU: 5 by 65.3. Florida: 2 by 100. Tennessee: 5 by 100. Arkansas: 1 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 46.7. Clemson: 6 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins41.5 · Games = 10 · +1 vs Losses
Losses40.5 · Games = 2 · -1 vs Wins
First Half28.9 · Games = 7 · -26.0 vs Second Half
Second Half54.8 · Games = 6 · +26.0 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Clemson

Best efficiency game

100 vs Clemson

Result
Tue 1/1@ MichiganHigh volume · 2+ TDW 33-2899210.210.20231
Sun 11/25@ Clemson100 receiving yardsW 27-17611917.419.80136
Sat 11/17vs Unknown53577113
Sat 11/10vs ArkansasW 38-201151515015
Sat 10/27vs TennesseeW 38-3557912.715.80124
Sat 10/20@ FloridaL 11-442321616020
Sun 10/14@ LSUL 21-235499.89.80121
Sat 10/6vs GeorgiaW 35-7
Sat 9/29@ KentuckyW 38-174153.23.8016
Sat 9/22vs MissouriW 31-101232323123
Sat 9/15vs UABW 49-645513.813.80125
Sat 9/8vs East CarolinaW 48-10144404
Thu 8/30@ VanderbiltW 17-132136.56.5007

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    South Carolina

    2010-2012

    Opening stop

Season Progression

201020102011201120122012
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2010 PostseasonSouth Carolina31661.110.8
2010 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina31661.110.80
2011 PostseasonSouth Carolina38371.318.167
2011 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina38371.318.10
2012 PostseasonSouth Carolina53172.220.9148
2012 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina53172.220.90

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Clemson

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

119

Primary metric

119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Vanderbilt

75

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Kentucky

70

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Troy

66

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Florida

50

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2012 Postseason · South Carolina

531 primary output · 72.2 efficiency · 20.9 usage

59.8

#2

2012 Regular Season · South Carolina

59.8

531 primary · 72.2 efficiency · 20.9 usage

#3

2011 Postseason · South Carolina

57.9

383 primary · 71.3 efficiency · 18.1 usage

Milestones

1

100+ receiving yards

1

8+ catch outings

2

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2021 · Rating 0.9048

Fossil Ridge · Fort Collins, CO

Committed To
Texas A&M
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2021

Career Facts

1

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

1,230

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.