Usage Score
20.9
Player Dossier
2010-2012South Carolina
WR • 5'8" • Bradenton, FL, USA
Ace Sanders reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20.9
Efficiency
72.2
Consistency
46.2
Season Value
59.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · South Carolina
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ace Sanders, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · South Carolina. Ace Sanders reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Ace Sanders played WR for South Carolina. Across 3 tracked seasons, Ace Sanders recorded 19 passing yards, 72 rushing yards, and 1,230 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with South Carolina.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
South Carolina paired 531 primary output with 72.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 72.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
40.8
Efficiency
72.2
Usage
20.9
Consistency
46.2
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 92. Vanderbilt: 13. East Carolina: 4. UAB: 55. Missouri: 23. Kentucky: 15. Georgia: 0. LSU: 49. Florida: 32. Tennessee: 79. Arkansas: 15. Unknown: 35. Clemson: 119
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 9 by 68.1. Vanderbilt: 2 by 43.3. East Carolina: 1 by 26.7. UAB: 4 by 91.7. Missouri: 1 by 100. Kentucky: 4 by 25. LSU: 5 by 65.3. Florida: 2 by 100. Tennessee: 5 by 100. Arkansas: 1 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 46.7. Clemson: 6 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Clemson
Best efficiency game
100 vs Clemson
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ MichiganHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 33-28 | — | 9 | 92 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 2 | 31 |
| Sun 11/25 | @ Clemson100 receiving yards | W 27-17 | — | 6 | 119 | 17.4 | 19.80 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 35 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Arkansas | W 38-20 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Tennessee | W 38-35 | — | 5 | 79 | 12.7 | 15.80 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Florida | L 11-44 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 10/14 | @ LSU | L 21-23 | — | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Georgia | W 35-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Kentucky | W 38-17 | — | 4 | 15 | 3.2 | 3.80 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Missouri | W 31-10 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs UAB | W 49-6 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs East Carolina | W 48-10 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Thu 8/30 | @ Vanderbilt | W 17-13 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
South Carolina
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | South Carolina | 316 | 61.1 | 10.8 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | South Carolina | 316 | 61.1 | 10.8 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | South Carolina | 383 | 71.3 | 18.1 | 67 |
| 2011 Regular Season | South Carolina | 383 | 71.3 | 18.1 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | South Carolina | 531 | 72.2 | 20.9 | 148 |
| 2012 Regular Season | South Carolina | 531 | 72.2 | 20.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Clemson
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
119
Primary metric
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Vanderbilt
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Kentucky
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Troy
66
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida
50
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · South Carolina
531 primary output · 72.2 efficiency · 20.9 usage
59.8
#2
2012 Regular Season · South Carolina
59.8
531 primary · 72.2 efficiency · 20.9 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · South Carolina
57.9
383 primary · 71.3 efficiency · 18.1 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9048
Fossil Ridge · Fort Collins, CO
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,230
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.