Usage Score
12.7
Player Dossier
2010-2011Mississippi State
WR • 6'0" • West Point, MS, USA
Michael Carr reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.7
Efficiency
77.8
Consistency
74
Season Value
64.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Mississippi State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Carr, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Mississippi State. Michael Carr reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Mississippi State paired 90 primary output with 77.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
30
Efficiency
77.8
Usage
12.7
Consistency
74
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 26. Auburn: 21. Kentucky: 43
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 2 by 86.7. Auburn: 3 by 46.7. Kentucky: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kentucky
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kentucky
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Mississippi State
2010-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Mississippi State | 74 | 80 | 10.9 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 74 | 80 | 10.9 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 90 | 77.8 | 12.7 | 16 |
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65
Primary metric
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kentucky
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Memphis
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Auburn
21
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Arkansas
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Mississippi State
90 primary output · 77.8 efficiency · 12.7 usage
64.6
#2
2010 Postseason · Mississippi State
43.7
74 primary · 80 efficiency · 10.9 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Mississippi State
43.7
74 primary · 80 efficiency · 10.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.905
West Point · West Point, MS
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
164
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Michael Carr quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit