Usage Score
8.1
Player Dossier
2010-2012Michigan
WR • 6'1" • Canton, OH, USA
Jerald Robinson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8.1
Efficiency
76
Consistency
56.5
Season Value
59.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jerald Robinson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Michigan. Jerald Robinson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jerald Robinson played WR for Michigan. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jerald Robinson recorded 69 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Michigan paired 69 primary output with 76 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
13.8
Efficiency
76
Usage
8.1
Consistency
56.5
Best Game by takeover score
Minnesota
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 10. Massachusetts: 9. Notre Dame: 20. Illinois: 8. Minnesota: 22
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 1 by 66.7. Massachusetts: 1 by 60. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. Illinois: 1 by 53.3. Minnesota: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
100 vs Minnesota
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 69 | 76 | 8.1 | 69 |
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22
Primary metric
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Air Force
10
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
Massachusetts
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
Illinois
8
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Michigan
69 primary output · 76 efficiency · 8.1 usage
59.8
#2
2010 Regular Season · Michigan
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Michigan
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8904
Canton South · Canton, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
69
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.