Usage Score
10
Player Dossier
2010-2013Michigan
Drew Dileo
WR • 5'10" • Greenwell Springs, LA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Drew Dileo reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67.9
Consistency
35.3
Season Value
42.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Michigan
10111112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drew Dileo, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Michigan. Drew Dileo reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Michigan paired 118 primary output with 92.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Michigan
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
19.3
Efficiency
67.9
Usage
10
Consistency
35.3
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 9. Central Michigan: 43. Notre Dame: 18. Akron: 0. UConn: 13. Minnesota: 12. Penn State: 13. Northwestern: 6. Ohio State: 60
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 2 by 30. Central Michigan: 2 by 100. Notre Dame: 3 by 40. UConn: 1 by 86.7. Minnesota: 1 by 80. Penn State: 1 by 86.7. Northwestern: 1 by 40. Ohio State: 5 by 80
Split Comparison
Wins15.3 · n=6 · -12.0 vs Losses
Losses27.3 · n=3 · +12.0 vs Wins
First Half16.6 · n=5 · -6.1 vs Second Half
Second Half22.8 · n=4 · +6.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Central Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/29 | @ Kansas State | L 14-31 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Ohio State | L 41-42 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Northwestern | W 27-19 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Penn State | L 40-43 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Minnesota | W 42-13 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/22 | @ UConn | W 24-21 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Akron | W 28-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Notre Dame | W 41-30 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Central Michigan | W 59-9 | — | 2 | 43 | 21.5 | 21.50 | 0 | 36 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201120112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan | 3 | 20 | 4.3 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Michigan | 118 | 92.8 | 11.2 | 115 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan | 118 | 92.8 | 11.2 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Michigan | 331 | 69.6 | 14.6 | 213 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 331 | 69.6 | 14.6 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Michigan | 174 | 67.9 | 10 | -157 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 174 | 67.9 | 10 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
92
Primary metric
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Massachusetts
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ohio State
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Michigan
118 primary output · 92.8 efficiency · 11.2 usage
52.6
#2
2011 Regular Season · Michigan
52.6
118 primary · 92.8 efficiency · 11.2 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Michigan
51.9
331 primary · 69.6 efficiency · 14.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8611
Parkview Baptist School · Baton Rouge, LA
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
626
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.