Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2010-2013Rutgers
Jeremy Deering
WR • 6'2" • Tampa, FL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jeremy Deering reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
100
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Rutgers
1011121213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy Deering, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Rutgers. Jeremy Deering reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
South Florida
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Eastern Michigan: 0. Louisville: 0. Temple: 0. UConn: 0. South Florida: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins0 · n=3 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=2 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0 · n=3 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · n=2 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Florida
Best efficiency game
— vs South Florida
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011201220122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Rutgers | 338 | 89.2 | 11.2 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rutgers | 65 | 70 | 6 | -273 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rutgers | 12 | 80 | 6.7 | -53 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rutgers | 12 | 80 | 6.7 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | -12 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102
Primary metric
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UConn
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Army
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulane
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Army
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Rutgers
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2010 Regular Season · Rutgers
46.3
338 primary · 89.2 efficiency · 11.2 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Rutgers
23.4
65 primary · 70 efficiency · 6 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8752
Leto · Tampa, FL
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
415
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.