Usage Score
14.8
Player Dossier
2010-2013Rutgers
Brandon Coleman
WR • 6'6" • Accokeek, MD, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Brandon Coleman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
94.7
Consistency
62.3
Season Value
62.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Rutgers
10111112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Coleman, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Rutgers. Brandon Coleman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Rutgers paired 718 primary output with 89.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Rutgers
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
44.8
Efficiency
94.7
Usage
14.8
Consistency
62.3
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 65. Fresno State: 94. Unknown: 30. Eastern Michigan: 15. Arkansas: 25. SMU: 56. Louisville: 66. Temple: 40. Cincinnati: 77. UCF: 20. UConn: 36. South Florida: 14
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 2 by 100. Fresno State: 9 by 69.6. Unknown: 2 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 100. Arkansas: 1 by 100. SMU: 2 by 100. Louisville: 5 by 88. Temple: 2 by 100. Cincinnati: 6 by 85.6. UCF: 1 by 100. UConn: 2 by 100. South Florida: 1 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Wins30 · n=5 · -29.7 vs Losses
Losses59.7 · n=6 · +29.7 vs Wins
First Half47.5 · n=6 · +5.3 vs Second Half
Second Half42.2 · n=6 · -5.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Fresno State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Notre Dame | L 16-29 | — | 2 | 65 | 32.5 | 32.50 | 1 | 51 |
| Sun 12/8 | vs South Florida | W 31-6 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ UConn | L 17-28 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 19 |
| Fri 11/22 | @ UCF | L 17-41 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Cincinnati | L 17-52 | — | 6 | 77 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Temple | W 23-20 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 30 |
| Thu 10/10 | @ Louisville | L 10-24 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ SMU | W 55-52 | — | 2 | 56 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 56 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Arkansas | W 28-24 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 28-10 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 26 |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Fresno StateHigh volume · 2+ TD | L 51-52 | — | 9 | 94 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 2 | 28 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201120112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Rutgers | 552 | 95.6 | 9.4 | 552 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rutgers | 552 | 95.6 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rutgers | 718 | 89.6 | 19.6 | 166 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rutgers | 718 | 89.6 | 19.6 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Rutgers | 538 | 94.7 | 14.8 | -180 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 538 | 94.7 | 14.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104
Primary metric
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UConn
223
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
223 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisville
100
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 98.9 efficiency score.
#5
Fresno State
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 69.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Rutgers
718 primary output · 89.6 efficiency · 19.6 usage
69.9
#2
2012 Regular Season · Rutgers
69.9
718 primary · 89.6 efficiency · 19.6 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Rutgers
62.9
538 primary · 94.7 efficiency · 14.8 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.9006
Bishop McNamara · District Heights, MD
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,808
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.