Usage Score
1.6
Player Dossier
2013-2015Rutgers
FB • 6'0" • East Stroudsburg, PA, USA
Sam Bergen leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 86.7 efficiency.
Usage Score
1.6
Efficiency
86.7
Consistency
78.3
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Rutgers
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sam Bergen, FB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Rutgers. Sam Bergen leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 86.7 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 64 primary output with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with 15 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Scrimmage Yards / G
10.7
Efficiency
86.7
Usage
1.6
Consistency
78.3
Best Game by takeover score
Maryland
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 12. Washington State: 14. Kansas: 14. Indiana: 15. Nebraska: 0. Maryland: 9
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 100. Washington State: 2 by 58.3. Kansas: 1 by 100. Indiana: 1 by 100. Maryland: 1 by 75
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs Indiana
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rutgers
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 64 | 86.7 | 1.6 | 64 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with 15 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
15
Primary metric
15 scrimmage yards and 1.5 usage.
#2
Kansas
14
Primary metric
Win with 14 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
14 scrimmage yards and 1.4 usage.
#3
Unknown
12
Primary metric
Game with 12 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
12 scrimmage yards and 1.7 usage.
#4
Washington State
14
Primary metric
Loss with 14 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
14 scrimmage yards and 3.3 usage.
#5
Maryland
9
Primary metric
Loss with 9 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
9 scrimmage yards and 1.5 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Rutgers
64 primary output · 86.7 efficiency · 1.6 usage
66.2
#2
2014 Regular Season · Rutgers
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Rutgers
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8067
South · East Stroudsburg, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
64
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 7 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Sam Bergen quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit