Player Stats

Jerome Smith College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,380
Rushing yards
2,219
Receiving yards
161
Touchdowns
17

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2010 Regular SeasonSyracuse00000-
2011 Regular SeasonSyracuse81381344124.9
2012 PostseasonSyracuse131521520077.1
2012 Regular SeasonSyracuse131,1021,01983377.1
2013 PostseasonSyracuse13927418168.4
2013 Regular SeasonSyracuse13896840561268.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Syracuse paired 1,254 primary output with 54.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 45.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: NC State

Win with 145 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · Syracuse

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

76

Efficiency

45.4

Usage

27

Consistency

72

Best Game by takeover score

NC State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 92. Penn State: 80. Northwestern: 45. Wagner: 61. Tulane: 73. Clemson: 125. NC State: 145. Georgia Tech: 43. Wake Forest: 64. Maryland: 120. Florida State: 1. Pittsburgh: 88. Boston College: 51

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 17 by 51.5. Penn State: 17 by 48.1. Northwestern: 11 by 42.6. Wagner: 14 by 45.4. Tulane: 12 by 49.1. Clemson: 18 by 72.3. NC State: 20 by 76.3. Georgia Tech: 11 by 40.7. Wake Forest: 18 by 37.6. Maryland: 29 by 43.6. Florida State: 5 by 2.1. Pittsburgh: 17 by 53.9. Boston College: 19 by 27.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins86.6 · Games = 7 · +22.9 vs Losses
Losses63.7 · Games = 6 · -22.9 vs Wins