Usage Score
7.9
Player Dossier
2010-2013Bowling Green
TE • 6'2" • Wyomissing, PA, USA
Tyler Beck reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
7.9
Efficiency
82.9
Consistency
70.1
Season Value
64.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Beck, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Tyler Beck reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Tyler Beck played TE for Bowling Green. Across 4 tracked seasons, Tyler Beck recorded 348 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Bowling Green.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 177 primary output with 82.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
22.1
Efficiency
82.9
Usage
7.9
Consistency
70.1
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 25. Kent State: 41. Unknown: 9. Massachusetts: 23. Mississippi State: 33. Toledo: 5. Buffalo: 13. Northern Illinois: 28
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 2 by 83.3. Kent State: 1 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 60. Massachusetts: 1 by 100. Mississippi State: 2 by 100. Toledo: 1 by 33.3. Buffalo: 1 by 86.7. Northern Illinois: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/7 | @ Northern Illinois | W 47-27 | — | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 1 | 28 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Buffalo | W 24-7 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Toledo | L 25-28 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Mississippi State | L 20-21 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Massachusetts | W 28-7 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Kent State | W 41-22 | — | 1 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 0 | 41 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Tulsa | W 34-7 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 14 | 46.7 | 6.9 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 97 | 62.8 | 6.3 | 83 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 60 | 59.2 | 6.5 | -37 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 177 | 82.9 | 7.9 | 117 |
#1 Featured game
Idaho
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42
Primary metric
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
28
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Mississippi State
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Northern Illinois
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Bowling Green
177 primary output · 82.9 efficiency · 7.9 usage
64.8
#2
2011 Regular Season · Bowling Green
39.5
97 primary · 62.8 efficiency · 6.3 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Bowling Green
39.4
60 primary · 59.2 efficiency · 6.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.7667
Wilson · Reading, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
348
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.