Player Stats

Heath Jackson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
666
Receptions
69
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2010 Regular SeasonBowling Green0-00-
2011 Regular SeasonBowling Green3-00100
2012 Regular SeasonBowling Green1332062.8
2013 PostseasonBowling Green7578084.1
2013 Regular SeasonBowling Green727286384.1
2014 PostseasonBowling Green10326054.8
2014 Regular SeasonBowling Green1031244054.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season

Bowling Green paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 49 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: VMI

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · Bowling Green

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

27

Efficiency

49

Usage

13.9

Consistency

50

Best Game by takeover score

VMI

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 26. Western Kentucky: 58. VMI: 59. Indiana: 48. Wisconsin: 30. Buffalo: 5. Ohio: 14. Western Michigan: 13. Kent State: 5. Ball State: 12

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 3 by 57.8. Western Kentucky: 5 by 77.3. VMI: 6 by 65.6. Indiana: 8 by 40. Wisconsin: 3 by 66.7. Buffalo: 1 by 33.3. Ohio: 2 by 46.7. Western Michigan: 3 by 28.9. Kent State: 1 by 33.3. Ball State: 2 by 40

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins26.2 · Games = 6 · -2.1 vs Losses
Losses28.3 · Games = 4 · +2.1 vs Wins