Usage Score
6.5
Player Dossier
2010-2011Bowling Green
Trent Hurley
QB • 6'2" • Connellsville, PA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Trent Hurley is a balanced quarterback profile with 6.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
61.8
Consistency
45.9
Season Value
53.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Bowling Green
1011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trent Hurley, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Trent Hurley is a balanced quarterback profile with 6.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 146 primary output with 61.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 61.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Game shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Games
3
Primary Metric / G
48.7
Efficiency
61.8
Usage
6.5
Consistency
45.9
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
Not enough games are available for a full trend line yet.
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
16.5 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/30 | @ Pittsburgh | — | 6 | 13 | 19 | 46.2 | 0 | 3 | 16.5 | 3 | -21 | -7 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2010-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 146 | 61.8 | 6.5 | 146 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Navy
Game shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
159
Primary metric
159 total offense with 52.5 efficiency.
#2
Western Michigan
97
Primary metric
Loss with 97 yards of offense and 67.7 efficiency.
97 total offense with 67.7 efficiency.
#3
Unknown
38
Primary metric
Game with 38 yards of offense and 67.7 efficiency.
38 total offense with 67.7 efficiency.
#4
Northern Illinois
11
Primary metric
Loss with 11 yards of offense and 50 efficiency.
11 total offense with 50 efficiency.
#5
Pittsburgh
-2
Primary metric
Game shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
-2 total offense with 16.5 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Bowling Green
146 primary output · 61.8 efficiency · 6.5 usage
53.4
#2
2010 Regular Season · Bowling Green
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
2
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.83
Greensburg Central Catholic · Greensburg, PA
- Committed To
- Bowling Green
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
146
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.