Usage Score
5
Player Dossier
2010-2012Ball State
TE • 6'2" • Cincinnati, OH, USA
David Schneider reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
5
Efficiency
32.5
Consistency
68.1
Season Value
34.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Ball State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Schneider, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Ball State. David Schneider reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Ball State paired 73 primary output with 88.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 32.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
5.8
Efficiency
32.5
Usage
5
Consistency
68.1
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Eastern Michigan: 7. South Florida: 4. Northern Illinois: 9. Army: 3
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 23.3. South Florida: 1 by 26.7. Northern Illinois: 1 by 60. Army: 1 by 20
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Best efficiency game
60 vs Northern Illinois
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ball State
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Ball State | 73 | 88.3 | 8.3 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ball State | 70 | 53.3 | 4.9 | -3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ball State | 23 | 32.5 | 5 | -47 |
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31
Primary metric
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Army
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northern Illinois
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
Toledo
14
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Ball State
73 primary output · 88.3 efficiency · 8.3 usage
64.8
#2
2011 Regular Season · Ball State
46.8
70 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 4.9 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Ball State
34.1
23 primary · 32.5 efficiency · 5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8244
Archbishop Moeller · Cincinnati, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
166
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
David Schneider quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit