Usage Score
17.6
Player Dossier
2010-2013UCF
WR • 5'11" • Miami, FL, USA
Jeff Godfrey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
17.6
Efficiency
59
Consistency
61.5
Season Value
38.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · UCF
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeff Godfrey, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · UCF. Jeff Godfrey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jeff Godfrey played WR for UCF. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jeff Godfrey recorded 4,095 passing yards, 1,105 rushing yards, and 835 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with UCF.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
UCF paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 59 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
33.8
Efficiency
59
Usage
17.6
Consistency
61.5
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 60. Akron: 13. Florida International: 33. Penn State: 28. South Carolina: 18. Memphis: 11. Louisville: 20. UConn: 54. Houston: 67. Temple: 0. Rutgers: 40. SMU: 62
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 5 by 80. Akron: 2 by 43.3. Florida International: 4 by 55. Penn State: 1 by 100. South Carolina: 3 by 40. Memphis: 3 by 24.4. Louisville: 3 by 44.4. UConn: 6 by 60. Houston: 5 by 89.3. Temple: 3 by 0. Rutgers: 3 by 88.9. SMU: 5 by 82.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/2 | @ Baylor | W 52-42 | — | 5 | 60 | 11.2 | 12 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 12/7 | @ SMU | W 17-13 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 24 |
| Fri 11/22 | vs Rutgers | W 41-17 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Temple | W 39-36 | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs Houston | W 19-14 | — | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs UConn2+ TD | W 62-17 | — | 6 | 54 | 8.3 | 9 | 3 | 25 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Louisville | W 38-35 | — | 3 | 20 | 5.8 | 6.70 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Memphis | W 24-17 | — | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs South Carolina | L 25-28 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Penn State | W 34-31 | — | 1 | 28 | 19.5 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Florida International | W 38-0 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Akron | W 38-7 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UCF
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | UCF | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | UCF | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UCF | 0 | 0 | 3.2 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | UCF | 429 | 66.6 | 15.9 | 429 |
| 2012 Regular Season | UCF | 429 | 66.6 | 15.9 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | UCF | 406 | 59 | 17.6 | -23 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UCF | 406 | 59 | 17.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Marshall
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Primary metric
71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
67
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 89.3 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
67
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 82.7 efficiency score.
#5
Baylor
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · UCF
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2010 Regular Season · UCF
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2012 Postseason · UCF
39.7
429 primary · 66.6 efficiency · 15.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8659
Miami Central · Miami, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
835
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.