Usage Score
4.9
Player Dossier
2010-2014UAB
TE • 6'3" • Oneonta, AL, USA
Nolen Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
4.9
Efficiency
43.4
Consistency
13.5
Season Value
16.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nolen Smith, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · UAB. Nolen Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Nolen Smith played TE for UAB. Across 5 tracked seasons, Nolen Smith recorded 37 passing yards, 318 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with UAB.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
UAB paired 273 primary output with 78.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 43.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
3.3
Efficiency
43.4
Usage
4.9
Consistency
13.5
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 0. Florida International: 0. North Texas: 1. Louisiana Tech: 12
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
80 vs Louisiana Tech
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | UAB | 5 | 33.3 | 7.7 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | UAB | 273 | 78.6 | 10.1 | 268 |
| 2012 Regular Season | UAB | 0 | — | — | -273 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UAB | 27 | 60 | 7.4 | 27 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UAB | 13 | 43.4 | 4.9 | -14 |
#1 Featured game
Florida Atlantic
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53
Primary metric
53 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UCF
54
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Louisiana Tech
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · UAB
273 primary output · 78.6 efficiency · 10.1 usage
63.9
#2
2010 Regular Season · UAB
35.7
5 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 7.7 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UAB
33.6
27 primary · 60 efficiency · 7.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8467
Oneonta · Oneonta, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
318
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.