Player Stats

J.J. Nelson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,273
Receptions
116
Touchdowns
27

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonUAB1217358547.5
2012 Regular SeasonUAB722414455.7
2013 Regular SeasonUAB10428461085.8
2014 Regular SeasonUAB1235655867.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

UAB paired 846 primary output with 97.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 82.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · UAB

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

54.6

Efficiency

82.3

Usage

18

Consistency

51.8

Best Game by takeover score

Mississippi State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Troy: 65. Mississippi State: 144. Alabama A&M: 32. Florida International: 55. Western Kentucky: 43. North Texas: 104. Middle Tennessee: 3. Arkansas: 0. Florida Atlantic: 125. Louisiana Tech: 54. Marshall: 10. Southern Miss: 20

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 2 by 100. Mississippi State: 5 by 100. Alabama A&M: 2 by 100. Florida International: 4 by 91.7. Western Kentucky: 2 by 100. North Texas: 4 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 20. Florida Atlantic: 6 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 60. Marshall: 1 by 66.7. Southern Miss: 2 by 66.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins64.8 · Games = 6 · +20.5 vs Losses
Losses44.3 · Games = 6 · -20.5 vs Wins