Player Stats

Jackie Williams College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,789
Receptions
147
Touchdowns
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2010 Regular SeasonUAB1230327446.9
2011 Regular SeasonUAB1158607376.8
2012 Regular SeasonUAB1252799277.8
2013 Regular SeasonUCF0-00-
2014 Regular SeasonUCF8756138.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season

UAB paired 799 primary output with 88.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 59.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UAB, UCF.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Missouri

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · UCF

Games

8

Receiving Yards / G

7

Efficiency

59.6

Usage

8.4

Consistency

57.9

Best Game by takeover score

Missouri

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 17. Bethune-Cookman: 0. Houston: 6. BYU: 10. Temple: 9. UConn: 14. SMU: 0. South Florida: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 1 by 100. Houston: 1 by 40. BYU: 1 by 66.7. Temple: 1 by 60. UConn: 3 by 31.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins4.2 · Games = 6 · -11.3 vs Losses
Losses15.5 · Games = 2 · +11.3 vs Wins