Usage / Role
15%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2010-2014SMU
RB • 5'11" • Mt. Enterprise, TX, USA
Kevin Pope leans balanced backfield option traits and 28.2 efficiency.
Usage / Role
15%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
15
Developing production for a back
Reliability
3
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
27
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · SMU
Snapshot
Kevin Pope, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · SMU. Kevin Pope leans balanced backfield option traits and 28.2 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | SMU | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 35.1 |
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| 2012 Regular Season | SMU | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 3 | 150 | 89 | 61 | 0 | 66.4 |
| 2014 Regular Season | SMU | 6 | 128 | 105 | 23 | 0 | 50.7 |
Related Context
Kevin Pope played RB for SMU. Across 5 tracked seasons, Kevin Pope recorded 200 rushing yards and 84 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
SMU paired 150 primary output with 62.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 28.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Loss with 46 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Scrimmage Yards / G
21.3
Efficiency
28.2
Usage
14.2
Consistency
48.6
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 19. North Texas: 46. Texas A&M: 44. TCU: 15. East Carolina: 1. Cincinnati: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 11 by 16.6. North Texas: 10 by 44.9. Texas A&M: 11 by 41.7. TCU: 5 by 31.3. East Carolina: 3 by 3.5. Cincinnati: 1 by 31.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
44.9 vs North Texas
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | SMU | 6 | 20.8 | 5.5 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | 0 | -6 |
| 2012 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 150 | 62.1 | 13.6 | 150 |
| 2014 Regular Season | SMU | 128 | 28.2 | 14.2 | -22 |
#1 Featured game
vs UCF
Week 15 · L 13-17 · Conference game
Loss with 86 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
86
Scrimmage Yards
78.1 takeover
86 scrimmage yards and 20.8 usage.
#2
@ North Texas
Week 2 · L 6-43
46
Scrimmage Yards
73.3 takeover
Loss with 46 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
46 scrimmage yards and 26.3 usage.
#3
vs Texas A&M
Week 4 · L 6-58
44
Scrimmage Yards
64.5 takeover
Loss with 44 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
44 scrimmage yards and 19.6 usage.
#4
@ Houston
Week 14 · L 0-34 · Conference game
64
Scrimmage Yards
60.3 takeover
Loss with 64 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
64 scrimmage yards and 20 usage.
#5
vs UAB
Week 2 · W 28-7 · Conference game
6
Scrimmage Yards
45.5 takeover
Win with 6 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
6 scrimmage yards and 5.5 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · SMU
150 primary output · 62.1 efficiency · 13.6 usage
66.4
#2
2014 Regular Season · SMU
50.7
128 primary · 28.2 efficiency · 14.2 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · SMU
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.