Usage Score
28.9
Player Dossier
2010-2013SMU
WR • 6'0" • Tyler, TX, USA
Jeremy Johnson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
28.9
Efficiency
63
Consistency
68
Season Value
64.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · SMU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy Johnson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · SMU. Jeremy Johnson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
SMU paired 1,112 primary output with 63 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 63 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
92.7
Efficiency
63
Usage
28.9
Consistency
68
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 131. Unknown: 112. Texas A&M: 16. TCU: 159. Rutgers: 217. Memphis: 100. Temple: 17. Cincinnati: 102. UConn: 71. South Florida: 82. Houston: 75. UCF: 30
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 12 by 72.8. Unknown: 7 by 100. Texas A&M: 4 by 26.7. TCU: 11 by 96.4. Rutgers: 18 by 80.4. Memphis: 10 by 66.7. Temple: 2 by 56.7. Cincinnati: 11 by 61.8. UConn: 12 by 39.4. South Florida: 13 by 42.1. Houston: 8 by 62.5. UCF: 4 by 50
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/7 | vs UCF | L 13-17 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ HoustonHigh volume | L 0-34 | — | 8 | 75 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ South FloridaHigh volume | W 16-6 | — | 13 | 82 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs UConnHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 38-21 | — | 12 | 71 | 5.9 | 5.90 | 2 | 10 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Cincinnati100 receiving yards · High volume | L 25-28 | — | 11 | 102 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Temple | W 59-49 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-29 | — | 10 | 100 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Rutgers100 receiving yards · High volume | L 52-55 | — | 18 | 217 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 3 | 45 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ TCU100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-48 | — | 11 | 159 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Texas A&M | L 13-42 | — | 4 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 7 | 112 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 66 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Texas Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | L 23-41 | — | 12 | 131 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 0 | 51 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | SMU | -1 | 0 | 4.2 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 146 | 53.1 | 15.1 | 147 |
| 2012 Regular Season | SMU | 679 | 64.2 | 25 | 533 |
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 1,112 | 63 | 28.9 | 433 |
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
217
Primary metric
217 receiving yards with a 80.4 efficiency score.
#2
TCU
159
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
159 receiving yards with a 96.4 efficiency score.
#3
Tulane
106
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 64.2 efficiency score.
#4
TCU
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
97
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 80.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · SMU
1,112 primary output · 63 efficiency · 28.9 usage
64.8
#2
2012 Regular Season · SMU
54.6
679 primary · 64.2 efficiency · 25 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · SMU
35.3
146 primary · 53.1 efficiency · 15.1 usage
7
100+ receiving yards
13
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8556
John Tyler · Tyler, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,936
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jeremy Johnson quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit