Usage Score
19.7
Player Dossier
2010-2014Rice
WR • 6'1" • Altair, TX, USA
Mario Hull reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
19.7
Efficiency
90
Consistency
64.1
Season Value
68.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Rice
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mario Hull, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Rice. Mario Hull reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Rice paired 621 primary output with 90 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 90 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
56.5
Efficiency
90
Usage
19.7
Consistency
64.1
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 82. Texas A&M: 57. Old Dominion: 27. Southern Miss: 85. Hawai'i: 59. Army: 37. North Texas: 11. Florida International: 10. UTSA: 49. UTEP: 150. Louisiana Tech: 54
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 3 by 100. Texas A&M: 3 by 100. Old Dominion: 3 by 60. Southern Miss: 4 by 100. Hawai'i: 2 by 100. Army: 2 by 100. North Texas: 1 by 73.3. Florida International: 1 by 66.7. UTSA: 3 by 100. UTEP: 6 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 90
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs Fresno State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/25 | vs Fresno State | W 30-6 | — | 3 | 82 | 27.3 | 27.30 | 1 | 69 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Louisiana Tech2+ TD | L 31-76 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 2 | 35 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs UTEP100 receiving yards | W 31-13 | — | 6 | 150 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 55 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs UTSA | W 17-7 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Florida International | W 31-17 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs North Texas | W 41-21 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Army | W 41-21 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Hawai'i | W 28-14 | — | 2 | 59 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 0 | 50 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Southern Miss | W 41-23 | — | 4 | 85 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Old Dominion | L 42-45 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/14 | @ Texas A&M | L 10-38 | — | 3 | 57 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 35 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rice | 181 | 65.6 | 12.6 | 181 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | -181 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 99 | 49.6 | 15.1 | 99 |
| 2014 Postseason | Rice | 621 | 90 | 19.7 | 522 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rice | 621 | 90 | 19.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
150
Primary metric
150 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTSA
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulane
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 56.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Rice
621 primary output · 90 efficiency · 19.7 usage
68.4
#2
2014 Regular Season · Rice
68.4
621 primary · 90 efficiency · 19.7 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Rice
35.9
181 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 12.6 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8333
Rice · Rice, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
901
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Mario Hull quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit