Usage Score
33.7
Player Dossier
2010-2013Wisconsin
James White
RB • 5'10" • Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Workhorse runnerBig-play efficiency
James White leans workhorse runner traits and 65.6 efficiency.
Efficiency
65.6
Consistency
79.9
Season Value
69.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Wisconsin
1010111112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
James White, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Wisconsin. James White leans workhorse runner traits and 65.6 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 1,744 primary output with 65.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 65.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
134.2
Efficiency
65.6
Usage
33.7
Consistency
79.9
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 115. Massachusetts: 154. Unknown: 140. Arizona State: 69. Purdue: 194. Ohio State: 47. Northwestern: 130. Illinois: 127. Iowa: 151. BYU: 194. Indiana: 207. Minnesota: 126. Penn State: 90
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 14 by 84.2. Massachusetts: 12 by 100. Unknown: 25 by 54.3. Arizona State: 16 by 41.4. Purdue: 19 by 92.5. Ohio State: 12 by 40.5. Northwestern: 22 by 57.8. Illinois: 23 by 53.6. Iowa: 21 by 73.4. BYU: 29 by 67.8. Indiana: 22 by 89.2. Minnesota: 28 by 48.8. Penn State: 17 by 49
Split Comparison
Wins160.4 · n=8 · +80.1 vs Losses
Losses80.3 · n=4 · -80.1 vs Wins
First Half121.3 · n=7 · -27.9 vs Second Half
Second Half149.2 · n=6 · +27.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs Massachusetts
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ South Carolina100 rush yards | L 24-34 | 12 | 107 | 8.90 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8.2 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Penn State | L 24-31 | 13 | 56 | 4.30 | 0 | 4 | 34 | 5.3 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Minnesota100 rush yards | W 20-7 | 26 | 125 | 4.80 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4.5 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Indiana100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 51-3 | 20 | 205 | 10.30 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9.4 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs BYU100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 27-17 | 23 | 147 | 6.40 | 2 | 6 | 47 | 6.7 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Iowa100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 28-9 | 19 | 132 | 6.90 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 7.2 |
| Sun 10/20 | @ Illinois2+ TD | W 56-32 | 20 | 98 | 4.90 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 5.5 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Northwestern100 rush yards | W 35-6 | 19 | 101 | 5.30 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 5.9 |
| Sun 9/29 | @ Ohio State | L 24-31 | 8 | 31 | 3.90 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 3.9 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Purdue100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 41-10 | 16 | 145 | 9.10 | 1 | 3 | 49 | 10.2 |
| Sun 9/15 | @ Arizona State | L 30-32 | 12 | 45 | 3.80 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 4.3 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown100 rush yards | — | 22 | 109 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 31 | 5.6 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Massachusetts100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 45-0 | 11 | 143 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 12.8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102010201120112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Wisconsin | 1,140 | 62.7 | 23 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 1,140 | 62.7 | 23 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Wisconsin | 863 | 50.3 | 19.7 | -277 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 863 | 50.3 | 19.7 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Wisconsin | 938 | 52.9 | 16.6 | 75 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 938 | 52.9 | 16.6 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Wisconsin | 1,744 | 65.6 | 33.7 | 806 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 1,744 | 65.6 | 33.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
207
Primary metric
207 scrimmage yards and 38.6 usage.
#2
Minnesota
175
Primary metric
Win with 175 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
175 scrimmage yards and 24.6 usage.
#3
Michigan
200
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
200 scrimmage yards and 35.7 usage.
#4
Purdue
194
Primary metric
Win with 194 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
194 scrimmage yards and 31.7 usage.
#5
Northern Illinois
126
Primary metric
Win with 126 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
126 scrimmage yards and 16.4 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Wisconsin
1,744 primary output · 65.6 efficiency · 33.7 usage
69.8
#2
2013 Regular Season · Wisconsin
69.8
1,744 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 33.7 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Wisconsin
55.9
1,140 primary · 62.7 efficiency · 23 usage
Milestones
24
100+ rush yards
9
150+ scrimmage yards
13
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9165
Hapeville Charter · Atlanta, GA
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
4,685
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.