Usage Score
23.1
Player Dossier
2009-2013Wisconsin
TE • 6'5" • Menominee, MI, USA
Jacob Pedersen reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
23.1
Efficiency
80.5
Consistency
76.7
Season Value
70.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Wisconsin
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jacob Pedersen, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Wisconsin. Jacob Pedersen reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jacob Pedersen played TE for Wisconsin. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jacob Pedersen recorded 10 rushing yards, 1,394 receiving yards, and 17 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Wisconsin.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 551 primary output with 80.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
50.1
Efficiency
80.5
Usage
23.1
Consistency
76.7
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 50. Massachusetts: 15. Unknown: 54. Arizona State: 32. Northwestern: 30. Illinois: 47. Iowa: 73. BYU: 49. Indiana: 92. Minnesota: 45. Penn State: 64
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 3 by 100. Massachusetts: 2 by 50. Unknown: 3 by 100. Arizona State: 3 by 71.1. Northwestern: 4 by 50. Illinois: 3 by 100. Iowa: 3 by 100. BYU: 6 by 54.4. Indiana: 3 by 100. Minnesota: 5 by 60. Penn State: 4 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ South Carolina | L 24-34 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Penn State | L 24-31 | — | 4 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Minnesota | W 20-7 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Indiana | W 51-3 | — | 3 | 92 | 30.7 | 30.70 | 0 | 61 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs BYU | W 27-17 | — | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Iowa | W 28-9 | — | 3 | 73 | 24.3 | 24.30 | 1 | 44 |
| Sun 10/20 | @ Illinois | W 56-32 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Northwestern | W 35-6 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 1 | 11 |
| Sun 9/15 | @ Arizona State | L 30-32 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Massachusetts | W 45-0 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 11 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wisconsin
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 132 | 84.5 | 9 | 132 |
| 2011 Postseason | Wisconsin | 356 | 70.2 | 14.3 | 224 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 356 | 70.2 | 14.3 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Wisconsin | 355 | 72.2 | 17.5 | -1 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 355 | 72.2 | 17.5 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Wisconsin | 551 | 80.5 | 23.1 | 196 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 551 | 80.5 | 23.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
92
Primary metric
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Purdue
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon State
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Wisconsin
551 primary output · 80.5 efficiency · 23.1 usage
70.1
#2
2013 Regular Season · Wisconsin
70.1
551 primary · 80.5 efficiency · 23.1 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Wisconsin
51.3
355 primary · 72.2 efficiency · 17.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7667
Menominee · Menominee, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,394
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.