Usage Score
10.4
Player Dossier
2010-2012Memphis
TE • 6'2" • North Little Rock, AR, USA
Justin Henderson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.4
Efficiency
71.1
Consistency
65.6
Season Value
61.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Memphis
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Henderson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Memphis. Justin Henderson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Memphis paired 100 primary output with 71.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 71.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
20
Efficiency
71.1
Usage
10.4
Consistency
65.6
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulane: 40. UCF: 13. UAB: 25. Marshall: 20. Southern Miss: 2
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 2 by 100. UCF: 1 by 86.7. UAB: 3 by 55.6. Marshall: 1 by 100. Southern Miss: 1 by 13.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs Marshall
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Memphis
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Memphis | 8 | 26.7 | 4.9 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Memphis | 100 | 71.1 | 10.4 | 92 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | -100 |
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40
Primary metric
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UCF
6
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
25
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 55.6 efficiency score.
#5
UCF
13
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Memphis
100 primary output · 71.1 efficiency · 10.4 usage
61.1
#2
2010 Regular Season · Memphis
26.5
8 primary · 26.7 efficiency · 4.9 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Memphis
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.7667
North Little Rock · North Little Rock, AR
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
108
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 7 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Justin Henderson quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit