Player Stats

Brandon Hayes College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,660
Rushing yards
2,385
Receiving yards
275
Touchdowns
22

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2010 Regular SeasonMemphis00000-
2011 Regular SeasonMemphis00000-
2012 Regular SeasonMemphis961357637762.3
2013 Regular SeasonMemphis12979860119779.6
2014 PostseasonMemphis12844935072.9
2014 Regular SeasonMemphis1298490084872.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

Memphis paired 979 primary output with 45.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 48.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Florida

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · Memphis

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

89

Efficiency

48.4

Usage

28.3

Consistency

62.2

Best Game by takeover score

South Florida

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. BYU: 84. Austin Peay: 59. UCLA: 82. Middle Tennessee: 95. Ole Miss: 5. Houston: 32. SMU: 99. Tulsa: 199. Temple: 99. Tulane: 47. South Florida: 207. UConn: 60

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 26 by 27.4. Austin Peay: 11 by 55.9. UCLA: 14 by 48. Middle Tennessee: 22 by 47.5. Ole Miss: 2 by 26. Houston: 8 by 47. SMU: 14 by 73.7. Tulsa: 29 by 71.5. Temple: 28 by 32.8. Tulane: 17 by 28.8. South Florida: 24 by 85.9. UConn: 17 by 36.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins105.4 · Games = 9 · +65.8 vs Losses
Losses39.7 · Games = 3 · -65.8 vs Wins