Player Stats

Zach Zwinak College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,312
Rushing yards
2,108
Receiving yards
204
Touchdowns
22

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2010 Regular SeasonPenn State00000-
2011 Regular SeasonPenn State2770022.3
2012 Regular SeasonPenn State101,1771,000177780.3
2013 Regular SeasonPenn State121,016989271269.1
2014 Regular SeasonPenn State61121120333.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season

Penn State paired 1,177 primary output with 48.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 28.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UCF

Win with 32 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · Penn State

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

18.7

Efficiency

28.9

Usage

11.8

Consistency

61.8

Best Game by takeover score

UCF

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCF: 32. Akron: 30. Rutgers: 7. Massachusetts: 28. Northwestern: 8. Michigan: 7

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 12 by 27.8. Akron: 10 by 31.3. Rutgers: 2 by 36.5. Massachusetts: 9 by 32.4. Northwestern: 4 by 20.8. Michigan: 3 by 24.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins24.3 · Games = 4 · +16.8 vs Losses
Losses7.5 · Games = 2 · -16.8 vs Wins