Usage Score
12.7
Player Dossier
2010-2014Michigan State
WR • 6'1" • Vienna, GA, USA
Keith Mumphery reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.7
Efficiency
82.8
Consistency
62
Season Value
61.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Keith Mumphery, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Michigan State. Keith Mumphery reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Michigan State paired 495 primary output with 82.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
41.3
Efficiency
82.8
Usage
12.7
Consistency
62
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 87. Unknown: 43. Oregon: 23. Eastern Michigan: 6. Wyoming: 6. Nebraska: 34. Purdue: 11. Michigan: 28. Ohio State: 72. Maryland: 78. Rutgers: 61. Penn State: 46
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 4 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 100. Oregon: 2 by 76.7. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 40. Wyoming: 1 by 40. Nebraska: 2 by 100. Purdue: 2 by 36.7. Michigan: 1 by 100. Ohio State: 3 by 100. Maryland: 2 by 100. Rutgers: 4 by 100. Penn State: 3 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Baylor
Best efficiency game
100 vs Baylor
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | @ Baylor | W 42-41 | — | 4 | 87 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Penn State | W 34-10 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Rutgers | W 45-3 | — | 4 | 61 | 14.6 | 15.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ Maryland | W 37-15 | — | 2 | 78 | 27.7 | 39 | 0 | 62 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Ohio State | L 37-49 | — | 3 | 72 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Michigan | W 35-11 | — | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Purdue | W 45-31 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 10/5 | vs Nebraska | W 27-22 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Wyoming | W 56-14 | — | 1 | 6 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 73-14 | — | 1 | 6 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Oregon | L 27-46 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 43 | 43 | 43 | 0 | 43 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan State | 39 | 76.7 | 4.8 | 39 |
| 2012 Postseason | Michigan State | 515 | 70.3 | 17.4 | 476 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan State | 515 | 70.3 | 17.4 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Michigan State | 299 | 69.4 | 8.8 | -216 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan State | 299 | 69.4 | 8.8 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Michigan State | 495 | 82.8 | 12.7 | 196 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | 495 | 82.8 | 12.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Primary metric
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio State
79
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Baylor
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northwestern
79
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 87.8 efficiency score.
#5
Illinois
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Michigan State
495 primary output · 82.8 efficiency · 12.7 usage
61.8
#2
2014 Regular Season · Michigan State
61.8
495 primary · 82.8 efficiency · 12.7 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Michigan State
55.9
515 primary · 70.3 efficiency · 17.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8822
Dooly County · Vienna, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,348
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Keith Mumphery quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit