Usage Score
27.3
Player Profile
Tony Lippett
WR • 6'3" • Detroit, MI, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Tony Lippett reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
94.3
Consistency
67.8
Season Value
72.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Michigan State
1011121213131414
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Primary stop by seasons
- Michigan State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Michigan State
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Tony Lippett, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Michigan State. Tony Lippett reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Michigan State paired 1,198 primary output with 94.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · Michigan State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
92.2
Efficiency
94.3
Usage
27.3
Consistency
67.8
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 74. Unknown: 167. Oregon: 133. Eastern Michigan: 45. Wyoming: 76. Nebraska: 104. Purdue: 138. Indiana: 123. Michigan: 103. Ohio State: 64. Maryland: 46. Rutgers: 72. Penn State: 53
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 5 by 98.7. Unknown: 4 by 100. Oregon: 11 by 80.6. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 100. Wyoming: 4 by 100. Nebraska: 3 by 100. Purdue: 7 by 100. Indiana: 7 by 100. Michigan: 3 by 100. Ohio State: 5 by 85.3. Maryland: 4 by 76.7. Rutgers: 5 by 96. Penn State: 4 by 88.3
Split Comparison
Wins83.4 · n=10 · -15.1 vs Losses
Losses98.5 · n=2 · +15.1 vs Wins
First Half105.3 · n=7 · +28.5 vs Second Half
Second Half76.8 · n=6 · -28.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | @ Baylor | W 42-41 | — | 5 | 74 | 15.5 | 14.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Penn State | W 34-10 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Rutgers | W 45-3 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 30 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ Maryland | W 37-15 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Ohio State | L 37-49 | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Michigan100 receiving yards | W 35-11 | — | 3 | 103 | 34.3 | 34.30 | 1 | 70 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Indiana100 receiving yards | W 56-17 | — | 7 | 123 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Purdue100 receiving yards | W 45-31 | — | 7 | 138 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 1 | 39 |
| Sun 10/5 | vs Nebraska100 receiving yards | W 27-22 | — | 3 | 104 | 34 | 34.70 | 1 | 55 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Wyoming | W 56-14 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Eastern Michigan2+ TD | W 73-14 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 23 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Oregon100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-46 | — | 11 | 133 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 1 | 34 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 4 | 167 | 41.8 | 41.80 | 2 | 71 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011201220122013201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan State | 44 | 82.2 | 10.2 | 44 |
| 2012 Postseason | Michigan State | 392 | 67 | 15.3 | 348 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan State | 392 | 67 | 15.3 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Michigan State | 613 | 82.5 | 23.2 | 221 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan State | 613 | 82.5 | 23.2 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Michigan State | 1,198 | 94.3 | 27.3 | 585 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | 1,198 | 94.3 | 27.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Stanford
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94
Primary metric
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
167
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
167 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Purdue
138
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Boise State
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Michigan State
1,198 primary output · 94.3 efficiency · 27.3 usage
72.3
#2
2014 Regular Season · Michigan State
72.3
1,198 primary · 94.3 efficiency · 27.3 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Michigan State
58.2
613 primary · 82.5 efficiency · 23.2 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.86
Crockett · Detroit, MI
- Committed To
- Michigan State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,247
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.