Usage Score
36.3
Player Dossier
2010-2014Michigan State
Jeremy Langford
RB • 6'1" • Wayne, MI, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Jeremy Langford leans workhorse runner traits and 60.7 efficiency.
Efficiency
60.7
Consistency
80.7
Season Value
69.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Michigan State
10111213131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Michigan State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy Langford, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Michigan State. Jeremy Langford leans workhorse runner traits and 60.7 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Michigan State paired 1,584 primary output with 60.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 60.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · Michigan State
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
121.8
Efficiency
60.7
Usage
36.3
Consistency
80.7
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 169. Unknown: 57. Oregon: 85. Eastern Michigan: 60. Wyoming: 149. Nebraska: 111. Purdue: 112. Indiana: 109. Michigan: 195. Ohio State: 152. Maryland: 141. Rutgers: 126. Penn State: 118
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 29 by 61.8. Unknown: 13 by 45.7. Oregon: 25 by 36.6. Eastern Michigan: 9 by 69.4. Wyoming: 18 by 84.5. Nebraska: 30 by 39.3. Purdue: 14 by 83.3. Indiana: 21 by 54.1. Michigan: 36 by 54.2. Ohio State: 19 by 80.9. Maryland: 26 by 57.1. Rutgers: 16 by 82. Penn State: 31 by 40.4
Split Comparison
Wins129 · n=10 · +10.5 vs Losses
Losses118.5 · n=2 · -10.5 vs Wins
First Half106.1 · n=7 · -34.0 vs Second Half
Second Half140.2 · n=6 · +34.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
84.5 vs Wyoming
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | @ Baylor100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 42-41 | 27 | 162 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 5.8 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Penn State100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 34-10 | 30 | 118 | 3.90 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3.8 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Rutgers100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 45-3 | 16 | 126 | 7.90 | 2 | — | — | 7.9 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ Maryland100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 37-15 | 25 | 138 | 5.50 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5.4 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Ohio State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 37-49 | 18 | 137 | 7.60 | 3 | 1 | 15 | 8 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Michigan100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 35-11 | 35 | 177 | 5.10 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 5.4 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Indiana100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 56-17 | 21 | 109 | 5.20 | 3 | — | — | 5.2 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Purdue100 rush yards | W 45-31 | 13 | 104 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Sun 10/5 | vs Nebraska100 rush yards | W 27-22 | 29 | 111 | 3.80 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3.7 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Wyoming100 rush yards | W 56-14 | 16 | 137 | 8.60 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 8.3 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 73-14 | 9 | 60 | 6.70 | 1 | — | — | 6.7 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Oregon | L 27-46 | 24 | 86 | 3.60 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 3.4 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | 13 | 57 | 4.40 | 0 | — | — | 4.4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201120122013201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan State | 23 | 26.6 | 13.6 | 23 |
| 2013 Postseason | Michigan State | 1,579 | 50.2 | 41.1 | 1,556 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan State | 1,579 | 50.2 | 41.1 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Michigan State | 1,584 | 60.7 | 36.3 | 5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | 1,584 | 60.7 | 36.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
185
Primary metric
185 scrimmage yards and 50.9 usage.
#2
Michigan
195
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
195 scrimmage yards and 62.1 usage.
#3
Nebraska
174
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
174 scrimmage yards and 58.1 usage.
#4
Minnesota
143
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
143 scrimmage yards and 53.7 usage.
#5
Ohio State
152
Primary metric
Loss with 152 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
152 scrimmage yards and 32.8 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Michigan State
1,584 primary output · 60.7 efficiency · 36.3 usage
69.4
#2
2014 Regular Season · Michigan State
69.4
1,584 primary · 60.7 efficiency · 36.3 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Michigan State
67.4
1,579 primary · 50.2 efficiency · 41.1 usage
Milestones
20
100+ rush yards
5
150+ scrimmage yards
12
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8478
John Glenn · Westland, MI
- Committed To
- Michigan State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,186
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.