Usage Score
17.8
Player Dossier
2010-2015Utah
WR • 6'3" • Fontana, CA, USA
Kenneth Scott reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
17.8
Efficiency
65.5
Consistency
52.5
Season Value
58.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Utah
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kenneth Scott, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Utah. Kenneth Scott reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Utah paired 506 primary output with 62.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
35.2
Efficiency
65.5
Usage
17.8
Consistency
52.5
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 9. Michigan: 15. Utah State: 18. Fresno State: 16. Oregon: 75. California: 34. Arizona State: 116. USC: 30. Oregon State: 44. Washington: 37. Arizona: 18. UCLA: 14. Colorado: 31
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 1 by 60. Michigan: 2 by 50. Utah State: 2 by 60. Fresno State: 2 by 53.3. Oregon: 6 by 83.3. California: 4 by 56.7. Arizona State: 5 by 100. USC: 4 by 50. Oregon State: 2 by 100. Washington: 3 by 82.2. Arizona: 3 by 40. UCLA: 2 by 46.7. Colorado: 3 by 68.9
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oregon State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/19 | vs BYU | W 35-28 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Colorado | W 20-14 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs UCLA | L 9-17 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ Arizona | L 30-37 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 10 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Washington | W 34-23 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Oregon State | W 27-12 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ USC | L 24-42 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/18 | vs Arizona State100 receiving yards | W 34-18 | — | 5 | 116 | 23.2 | 23.20 | 1 | 42 |
| Sun 10/11 | vs California | W 30-24 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/27 | @ Oregon | W 62-20 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 28 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ Fresno State | W 45-24 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Utah State | W 24-14 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 9/4 | vs Michigan | W 24-17 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah
2010-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Utah | 141 | 76.7 | 11.4 | 141 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Utah | 360 | 69.4 | 17 | 219 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | -360 |
| 2014 Postseason | Utah | 506 | 62.6 | 21.6 | 506 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Utah | 506 | 62.6 | 21.6 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Utah | 457 | 65.5 | 17.8 | -49 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Utah | 457 | 65.5 | 17.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Fresno State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77
Primary metric
77 receiving yards with a 85.6 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona State
116
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Utah State
82
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Stanford
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona State
46
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Utah
506 primary output · 62.6 efficiency · 21.6 usage
62.6
#2
2014 Regular Season · Utah
62.6
506 primary · 62.6 efficiency · 21.6 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Utah
58.9
457 primary · 65.5 efficiency · 17.8 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8893
Colony · Ontario, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,464
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Kenneth Scott quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit