Usage Score
9.1
Player Dossier
2010-2014Illinois
Martize Barr
WR • 5'11" • Washington D.C., DC, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Martize Barr reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.7
Consistency
44.2
Season Value
53.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Illinois
10111314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- New Mexico • Illinois
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Martize Barr, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Illinois. Martize Barr reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Martize Barr played WR for New Mexico and Illinois. Across 4 tracked seasons, Martize Barr recorded 64 rushing yards, 574 receiving yards, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Illinois.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Illinois paired 249 primary output with 70.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across New Mexico, Illinois.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · Illinois
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
27.7
Efficiency
70.7
Usage
9.1
Consistency
44.2
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 40. Western Kentucky: 46. Washington: 15. Texas State: 36. Nebraska: 17. Purdue: 69. Wisconsin: 3. Iowa: 8. Northwestern: 15
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 100. Western Kentucky: 4 by 76.7. Washington: 1 by 100. Texas State: 3 by 80. Nebraska: 2 by 56.7. Purdue: 3 by 100. Wisconsin: 1 by 20. Iowa: 1 by 53.3. Northwestern: 2 by 50
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins32.3 · Games = 3 · +9.9 vs Losses
Losses22.4 · Games = 5 · -9.9 vs Wins
First Half30.8 · Games = 5 · +7.1 vs Second Half
Second Half23.8 · Games = 4 · -7.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Northwestern | W 47-33 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Iowa | L 14-30 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Wisconsin | L 28-38 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Purdue | L 27-38 | — | 3 | 69 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 9/28 | @ Nebraska | L 14-45 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Texas State | W 42-35 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Washington | L 19-44 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Western Kentucky | W 42-34 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 29 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
New Mexico
2010-2011
Opening stop
- 2
Illinois
2013-2014
Final stop
Season Progression
2010201120132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | New Mexico | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | New Mexico | 79 | 67.5 | 13.2 | 79 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Illinois | 246 | 57 | 10.9 | 167 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Illinois | 249 | 70.7 | 9.1 | 3 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72
Primary metric
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
#2
Wyoming
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Purdue
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
San Diego State
23
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
40
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Illinois
249 primary output · 70.7 efficiency · 9.1 usage
53.9
#2
2013 Regular Season · Illinois
47.1
246 primary · 57 efficiency · 10.9 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · New Mexico
46.4
79 primary · 67.5 efficiency · 13.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8356
Coolidge · Washington, DC
- Committed To
- New Mexico
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
574
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.