Usage Score
8.6
Player Dossier
2010-2014Kansas
WR • 6'3" • Butler, NJ, USA
Andrew Turzilli reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8.6
Efficiency
91.7
Consistency
53.6
Season Value
63.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Rutgers
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Turzilli, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Rutgers. Andrew Turzilli reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Rutgers paired 347 primary output with 91.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 91.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kansas, Rutgers.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
43.4
Efficiency
91.7
Usage
8.6
Consistency
53.6
Best Game by takeover score
North Carolina
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 34. Unknown: 50. Navy: 39. Tulane: 93. Michigan: 94. Ohio State: 17. Nebraska: 12. Indiana: 8
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 1 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Navy: 1 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 100. Michigan: 2 by 100. Ohio State: 1 by 100. Nebraska: 1 by 80. Indiana: 1 by 53.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Carolina
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kansas
2010-2013
Opening stop
Rutgers
2014
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Kansas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Kansas | 37 | 82.2 | 17.6 | 37 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Kansas | 287 | 73.9 | 17.6 | 250 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Kansas | 167 | 84.4 | 11.4 | -120 |
| 2014 Postseason | Rutgers | 347 | 91.7 | 8.6 | 180 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 347 | 91.7 | 8.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54
Primary metric
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
TCU
100
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulane
93
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
TCU
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Rutgers
347 primary output · 91.7 efficiency · 8.6 usage
63.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · Rutgers
63.5
347 primary · 91.7 efficiency · 8.6 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Kansas
60.5
287 primary · 73.9 efficiency · 17.6 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8333
Butler · Butler, NJ
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
838
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Andrew Turzilli quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit