Player Stats

Adrian Wilson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
108
TFL
3.5
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2023 Regular SeasonWashington State36-0--040.6
2024 Regular SeasonWashington State11452.5013036.8
2025 Regular SeasonArizona State12571016051.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Arizona State paired 9 primary output with 27.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 27.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Washington State, Arizona State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Arizona State

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

27.3

Usage

4.8

Consistency

38.9

Best Game by takeover score

Texas Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Northern Arizona: 0. Mississippi State: 1. Texas State: 0. Baylor: 1. TCU: 1. Utah: 1. Texas Tech: 4. Houston: 0. Iowa State: 0. West Virginia: 0. Colorado: 1. Arizona: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Arizona: 1 by 4.2. Mississippi State: 1 by 14.2. Texas State: 7 by 29.2. Baylor: 8 by 43.3. TCU: 6 by 35. Utah: 7 by 39.2. Texas Tech: 3 by 52.5. Houston: 6 by 25. Iowa State: 2 by 8.3. West Virginia: 5 by 20.8. Colorado: 5 by 30.8. Arizona: 6 by 25

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 8 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 4 · -0.4 vs Wins