Player Stats

Devin Mahina College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
554
Receptions
46
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2010 PostseasonBYU8220047.3
2010 Regular SeasonBYU8998047.3
2011 Regular SeasonBYU0-00-
2012 PostseasonBYU7138053.2
2012 Regular SeasonBYU7790253.2
2013 Regular SeasonBYU3764041.6
2014 PostseasonBYU11254060.7
2014 Regular SeasonBYU1118190360.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

BYU paired 244 primary output with 68.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 68.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Memphis

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · BYU

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

22.2

Efficiency

68.5

Usage

8.3

Consistency

46.8

Best Game by takeover score

Memphis

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 54. UConn: 8. Texas: 6. Houston: 16. Virginia: 4. UCF: 46. Nevada: 19. Boise State: 4. Middle Tennessee: 40. UNLV: 15. Savannah St: 32

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 2 by 100. UConn: 1 by 53.3. Texas: 1 by 40. Houston: 1 by 100. Virginia: 1 by 26.7. UCF: 4 by 76.7. Nevada: 2 by 63.3. Boise State: 1 by 26.7. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 66.7. UNLV: 1 by 100. Savannah St: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins17.3 · Games = 7 · -13.5 vs Losses
Losses30.8 · Games = 4 · +13.5 vs Wins