Usage / Role
9%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2010-2011Pittsburgh
QB • 6'4" • Cleveland, OH, USA
Mark Myers is a balanced quarterback profile with 3.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
9%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
0
Developing production for a quarterback
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
13
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Mark Myers, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Mark Myers is a balanced quarterback profile with 3.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 3 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 | 38.4 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38.4 |
Related Context
Mark Myers played QB for Pittsburgh. Across 2 tracked seasons, Mark Myers recorded 5 passing yards and -3 rushing yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 2 primary output with 35.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 35.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Loss with 2 yards of offense and 36.8 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Primary Metric / G
0.7
Efficiency
35.1
Usage
3.3
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 2. Notre Dame: 0. Louisville: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
36.8 vs SMU
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Pittsburgh
2010-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 2 | 35.1 | 3.3 | 2 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 2 | 35.1 | 3.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs SMU
Week 1 · L 6-28 · Postseason
Loss with 2 yards of offense and 36.8 efficiency.
2
Total Offense
48 takeover
2 total offense with 36.8 efficiency.
#2
@ Louisville
Week 11 · W 21-14 · Conference game
0
Total Offense
16.7 takeover
Win with 0 yards of offense and 33.3 efficiency.
0 total offense with 33.3 efficiency.
#3
vs Notre Dame
Week 4 · L 12-15
0
Total Offense
0 takeover
Loss with 0 yards of offense and 0 efficiency.
0 total offense with — efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Postseason · Pittsburgh
2 primary output · 35.1 efficiency · 3.3 usage
38.4
#2
2011 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
38.4
2 primary · 35.1 efficiency · 3.3 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ TD games
0
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.