Usage Score
24.1
Player Dossier
2010-2013Cincinnati
Anthony McClung
WR • 6'0" • Indianapolis, IN, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Anthony McClung reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.6
Consistency
73.4
Season Value
70.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Cincinnati
10111112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony McClung, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Cincinnati. Anthony McClung reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 939 primary output with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Cincinnati
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
78.3
Efficiency
83.6
Usage
24.1
Consistency
73.4
Best Game by takeover score
North Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 31. Purdue: 9. Illinois: 94. Unknown: 41. South Florida: 90. Temple: 86. UConn: 44. Memphis: 98. SMU: 97. Rutgers: 115. Houston: 137. Louisville: 97
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 4 by 51.7. Purdue: 1 by 60. Illinois: 6 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 91.1. South Florida: 8 by 75. Temple: 7 by 81.9. UConn: 3 by 97.8. Memphis: 9 by 72.6. SMU: 8 by 80.8. Rutgers: 7 by 100. Houston: 9 by 100. Louisville: 7 by 92.4
Split Comparison
Wins83.7 · n=7 · +5.7 vs Losses
Losses78 · n=4 · -5.7 vs Wins
First Half58.5 · n=6 · -39.5 vs Second Half
Second Half98 · n=6 · +39.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ North Carolina | L 17-39 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 12/6 | vs Louisville | L 24-31 | — | 7 | 97 | 13.9 | 13.90 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Houston100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-17 | — | 9 | 137 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Rutgers100 receiving yards | W 52-17 | — | 7 | 115 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs SMUHigh volume | W 28-25 | — | 8 | 97 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 0 | 21 |
| Thu 10/31 | @ MemphisHigh volume | W 34-21 | — | 9 | 98 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs UConn | W 41-16 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Temple2+ TD | W 38-20 | — | 7 | 86 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ South FloridaHigh volume | L 20-26 | — | 8 | 90 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Illinois | L 17-45 | — | 6 | 94 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Purdue | W 42-7 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201120112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 217 | 61.9 | 18.2 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | Cincinnati | 683 | 83.2 | 24.4 | 466 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 683 | 83.2 | 24.4 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Cincinnati | 539 | 83.9 | 17.4 | -144 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 539 | 83.9 | 17.4 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Cincinnati | 939 | 83.6 | 24.1 | 400 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 939 | 83.6 | 24.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
142
Primary metric
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
137
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Duke
110
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oklahoma
58
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
115
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Cincinnati
939 primary output · 83.6 efficiency · 24.1 usage
70.3
#2
2013 Regular Season · Cincinnati
70.3
939 primary · 83.6 efficiency · 24.1 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Cincinnati
60.7
683 primary · 83.2 efficiency · 24.4 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8533
Pike · Indianapolis, IN
- Committed To
- Cincinnati
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,378
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.