Player Stats

Shawn Corker College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
33
Receptions
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2010 Regular SeasonTexas Tech0-00-
2011 Regular SeasonTexas Tech2215051.7
2012 Regular SeasonTexas Tech0-00-
2013 Regular SeasonTexas Tech3318055.8
2014 Regular SeasonTexas Tech0-00-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

Texas Tech paired 18 primary output with 40 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 40 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: SMU

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Regular Season · Texas Tech

Games

3

Receiving Yards / G

6

Efficiency

40

Usage

3.2

Consistency

72.5

Best Game by takeover score

SMU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. SMU: 9. TCU: 7. Texas State: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 1 by 60. TCU: 1 by 46.7. Texas State: 1 by 13.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half8 · Games = 2 · +6 vs Second Half
Second Half2 · Games = 1 · -6 vs First Half