Usage Score
15.3
Player Dossier
2010-2014Texas
Darius Terrell
TE • 6'3" • DeSoto, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Darius Terrell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.6
Consistency
57.8
Season Value
60.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · North Texas
101112131314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas • North Texas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darius Terrell, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · North Texas. Darius Terrell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
North Texas paired 307 primary output with 69.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 69.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas, North Texas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · North Texas
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
27.9
Efficiency
69.6
Usage
15.3
Consistency
57.8
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 27. Louisiana Tech: 9. Unknown: 5. Indiana: 8. UAB: 38. Southern Miss: 34. Rice: 43. Florida Atlantic: 20. UTEP: 20. Florida International: 25. UTSA: 78
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 2 by 90. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 60. Unknown: 1 by 33.3. Indiana: 1 by 53.3. UAB: 4 by 63.3. Southern Miss: 2 by 100. Rice: 4 by 71.7. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 66.7. UTEP: 3 by 44.4. Florida International: 2 by 83.3. UTSA: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins24 · n=3 · -8.9 vs Losses
Losses32.9 · n=7 · +8.9 vs Wins
First Half20.2 · n=6 · -17.0 vs Second Half
Second Half37.2 · n=5 · +17.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ UTSA | L 27-34 | — | 5 | 78 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Florida International | W 17-14 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ UTEP | L 17-35 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 31-10 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Rice | L 21-41 | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Southern Miss | L 20-30 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ UAB | L 21-56 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Indiana | L 24-49 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Fri 9/12 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 21-42 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs SMU | W 43-6 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas
2010-2011
Opening stop
- 2
North Texas
2012-2014
Final stop
Season Progression
201020112012201320132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas | 3 | 20 | 6.3 | 3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | — | — | -3 |
| 2013 Postseason | North Texas | 76 | 65 | 7 | 76 |
| 2013 Regular Season | North Texas | 76 | 65 | 7 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | North Texas | 307 | 69.6 | 15.3 | 231 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
78
Primary metric
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Idaho
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Southern Miss
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 71.7 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · North Texas
307 primary output · 69.6 efficiency · 15.3 usage
60.6
#2
2013 Postseason · North Texas
42.3
76 primary · 65 efficiency · 7 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · North Texas
42.3
76 primary · 65 efficiency · 7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8933
DeSoto · DeSoto, TX
- Committed To
- Texas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
386
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.