Player Stats

Greg Daniels College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
118
Receptions
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2010 Regular SeasonTexas0-00-
2011 Regular SeasonTexas0-00-
2012 Regular SeasonTexas3590060
2013 PostseasonTexas318047.3
2013 Regular SeasonTexas3220047.3
2014 Regular SeasonTexas0-00-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season

Texas paired 90 primary output with 75.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 62.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: BYU

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · Texas

Games

3

Receiving Yards / G

9.3

Efficiency

62.2

Usage

6.3

Consistency

74.8

Best Game by takeover score

BYU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 8. BYU: 13. West Virginia: 7

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 1 by 53.3. BYU: 1 by 86.7. West Virginia: 1 by 46.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins7 · Games = 1 · -3.5 vs Losses
Losses10.5 · Games = 2 · +3.5 vs Wins